Tom Lane writes:
> Not sure what to do about this. It will clearly not do to define
> ACCEPT_TYPE_ARG3 as void. Perhaps we need a special case for
> Solaris 7: if we detect that accept() is declared with "void *",
> assume that socklen_t is the thing to use. Peter, any thoughts?
Perhaps we could, in case "void *" is discovered, run a similar deal with
bind() or setsockopt(), i.e., some socket function that takes a
non-pointer socklen_t (or whatever), in order to find out the true nature
of what's behind the "void *".
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/