Re: Operators and schemas

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Operators and schemas
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0204161831000.689-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Operators and schemas  (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>)
Ответы Re: Operators and schemas
Список pgsql-hackers
Fernando Nasser writes:

> I agree.   And for Entry level SQL'92 we are done -- only tables, views
> and grants are required.  The multiple schemas per user is already
> an intermediate SQL feature -- for intermediate SQL'92 we would still
> need domains and a character set specification.
>
> For SQL'99, we would have to add types, functions and triggers
> (only triggers are not part of Core SQL'99, but I would not leave them out).

I can hardly believe that we want to implement this just to be able to
check off a few boxes on the SQL-compliance test.  Once you have the
ability to use a fixed list of statements in this context it should be
easy to allow a more or less arbitrary list.  Especially if they all start
with the same key word it should be possible to parse this.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implicit coercions need to be reined in
Следующее
От: "Dann Corbit"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Operators and schemas