Re: Use of 8192 as BLCKSZ in xlog.c

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Michael Glaesemann wrote:

>
> Would it make sense to abstract that out so it's clear that it's
> *not* related to BLCKSZ? Or maybe just a comment would be enough.
>

"Insprite of incremental improvement", I think rename "buf" to "str" would
work,

Regards,
Qingqing