Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brandon Metcalf
Тема Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58L.0504081549460.18466@cash.rhiamet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg  (Vlad <marchenko@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
m == marchenko@gmail.com writes:
m> could you let us know YOUR  results with DBD::Pg 1.41 with and w/om> patch that I've posted earlier? I just did some
surface-deeptestingm> here and here is what I've found:
 
m> DBD-1.40 - slowm> DBD-1.41 - fastm> DBD-1.41, patched - fast. I  can't see difference between patched andm> non
patched.


Hm.  What I'm seeing is that both DBD-Pg-1.40 and DBD-Pg-1.41 are
_much_ slower than the old Pg module.  I see no difference between
1.40 and 1.41.

In order to test your patches for performance, I'll need to put
together a test environment that simulates the load in our production
environment.  I'll let you know.

-- 
Brandon


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: mps@theintraweb.net
Дата:
Сообщение: pg.py under Mac OS X
Следующее
От: "Brandon Metcalf"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg