Dear Horiguchi-san, Shlok,
>
> At Fri, 6 Oct 2023 12:28:32 +0530, Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com> wrote
> i> D:\project\pg_dev\bin>pg_ctl -D ../data -l data2.log start
> > pg_ctl: another server might be running; trying to start server anyway
> > waiting for server to start....pg_ctl: launcher shell died
> >
> > The output message after patch is different from the HEAD. I felt that
> > with patch as well we should get the message "pg_ctl: could not start
> > server".
> > Is this message change intentional?
>
> Partly no, partly yes. My focus was on verifying the accuracy of
> identifying the actual postmaster PID on Windows. The current patch
> provides a detailed description of the events, primarily because I
> lack a comprehensive understanding of both the behavior of Windows
> APIs and the associated processes. Given that context, the messages
> essentially serve debugging purposes.
>
> I agree with your suggestion. Ultimately, if there's a possibility
> for this to be committed, the message will be consolidated to "could
> not start server".
Based on the suggestion, I tried to update the patch.
A new argument is_valid is added for reporting callee. Also, reporting formats
are adjusted based on other functions. How do you think?
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED