On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments.
> @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum
> WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL,
> WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST,
> WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY,
> - WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE
> + WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE,
> + WAIT_EVENT_SPIN_DELAY
> } WaitEventTimeout;
That would be fine for stable branches, but could you keep that in an
alphabetical order on HEAD?
--
Michael