Re: Large number of partitions of a table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Victor Sudakov
Тема Re: Large number of partitions of a table
Дата
Msg-id YeUAx56Juri43xGY@admin.sibptus.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large number of partitions of a table  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Large number of partitions of a table  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:
[dd]

> The specific point that depesz was responding to in that blog
> was the 64K-ish limit on rangetable entries in a query.  That is
> a thing, as he could have shown by using queries that weren't
> amenable to plan-time pruning.  (It's also an ex-thing, having
> been fixed for v15 [1]; but that doesn't help you today.)
> Now, if you use no queries that can't be pruned to a few
> partitions, then it's academic for you.  

The table will be partitioned `BY LIST (customer_id)` which is a unique
index. All queries will be using this index so no query should ever
have to use more than 1 partition.

This means basically I'm OK?

-- 
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49@fidonet



В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Victor Sudakov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large number of partitions of a table
Следующее
От: Halat-Pruvot Sylvie
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: postgresql wait event and high active connection