On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:48:15AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> That's already been discussed in [1] and rejected, as it would also mean losing
> the ability to have pg_stat_statements (or any similar extension) coverage
> using the regression tests. I personally rely on regression tests for such
> custom extensions quite a lot, so I'm still -1 on that.
Well, I can see that this is a second independent complain after a few
months. If you wish to keep this capability, wouldn't it be better to
add a "regress" mode to compute_query_id, where we would mask
automatically this information in the output of EXPLAIN but still run
the computation?
--
Michael