Re: Peter Eisentraut
> I find the new version even harder to read. The catalog_table_entry stuff
> doesn't really make sense here, since what you have before is already a
> definition list, and afterwards you have the same, just marked up
> "incorrectly".
Fair enough. For comparison, this is what yesterday's patch looked
like: https://www.df7cb.de/s/2022-08-31.115813.w5UvAS.png
> We could move the data type in the <term>, similar to how you did it in your
> patch.
The new version of the patch just moves up the data types, and removes
the extra clutter from the beginnings of each description:
https://www.df7cb.de/s/2022-08-31.115857.LkkKl8.png
Christoph
