Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Дата
Msg-id ZFnJVcaEi/7t2U8H@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:34:56AM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Below is the configuration I've been using. I have been keeping the
> checkpoints away so far to get expected numbers. Probably, something
> that I should modify for this long run? Change checkpoint_timeout to
> 15 min or so?
>
> max_wal_size=64GB
> checkpoint_timeout=1d
> shared_buffers=8GB
> max_connections=5000

Noted.  Something like that should be OK IMO, with all the checkpoints
generated based on the volume generated.  With records that have a
fixed size, this should, I assume, lead to results that could be
compared across runs, even if the patched code would lead to more
checkpoints generated.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Следующее
От: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases