On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 05:53:40PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Yes. A simpler way of doing it would be to move advance_wal() in
> 019_replslot_limit.pl to Cluster.pm, something like the attached. CI
> members don't complain with it
> https://github.com/BRupireddy/postgres/tree/add_a_function_in_Cluster.pm_to_generate_WAL.
> Perhaps, we can name it better instead of advance_wal, say
> generate_wal or some other?
Why not discussing that on a separate thread? What you are proposing
is independent of what Vignesh has proposed. Note that the patch
format is octet-stream, causing extra CRs to exist in the patch.
Something happened on your side when you sent your patch, I guess?
--
Michael