Re: Temporary disabling a replica in a Patroni cluster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Victor Sudakov
Тема Re: Temporary disabling a replica in a Patroni cluster
Дата
Msg-id ZOwKIAAr2cpNUOY6@admin.sibptus.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Temporary disabling a replica in a Patroni cluster  (Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru>)
Список pgsql-admin
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> 
> Do you perchance know what is the correct procedure of temporarily
> taking down a replica in a Patroni cluster, e.g. for 5-10 minutes of
> hardware maintenance?
> 
> The problem is that after stopping the patroni process (service) on a
> replica, patroni removes the corresponding physical replication slot
> from the leader, and unless the wal_keep_size value is unsanely high,
> the replica, when up again, cannot restart streaming because the WAL
> segments are already gone from the leader.
> 
> Well, you all know:
> <%%%>LOG:  started streaming WAL from primary at B4A0/E2000000 on timeline 8
> <%%%>FATAL:  could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR:  requested WAL segment 000000080000B4A0000000E2 has
alreadybeen removed
 
> <%%%>LOG:  waiting for WAL to become available at B4A0/E2002000
> 
> Do you think there is a way to tell Patroni that a replica is down
> temporarily and its replication slot should not be removed?
> 
> Or, what am I missing? 

As WAL archiving (wal-g) is enabled in this cluster anyway, do you
think adding "postgresql.parameters.restore_command" to the Patroni
config will help in this situation? 

restore_command works very well in regular Postgres clusters catching
up from a big replication delay and permits to have wal_keep_size=0,
however does anyone know if there are any Patroni-specific reasons not
to use restore_command under Patroni?

-- 
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49@fidonet



В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajesh Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Autovacuum not running properly
Следующее
От: "Wetmore, Matthew (CTR)"
Дата:
Сообщение: Autovacuum not running properly