Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Дата
Msg-id ZQ-UGWtLyHQ9shlp@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:53:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> No new thoughts. I'm still all in favor of this. Thanks for picking it up.

Okay, thanks.  I guess that nobody would complain if I were to apply
that..

> At some point we should completely ban the use of "long".

Indeed, or Windows decides that making long 8-byte is wiser, but I
doubt that's ever going to happen on backward-compatibility ground.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: nbtree's ScalarArrayOp array mark/restore code appears to be buggy
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoid a possible out-of-bounds access (src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c)