On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:49:53AM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-11-13 12:14:57 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > +SELECT *
> > +FROM (values ('0/16ffffff'), ('0/17000000'), ('0/17000001')) as t(lsn),
> > + LATERAL pg_walfile_name_offset(lsn::pg_lsn),
> > + LATERAL pg_walfile_name(lsn::pg_lsn);
> > + lsn | file_name | file_offset | pg_walfile_name
> > +------------+--------------------------+-------------+--------------------------
> > + 0/16ffffff | 000000010000000000000016 | 16777215 | 000000010000000000000016
> > + 0/17000000 | 000000010000000000000017 | 0 | 000000010000000000000017
> > + 0/17000001 | 000000010000000000000017 | 1 | 000000010000000000000017
> > +(3 rows)
>
> These would break when testing with a different segment size. Today that's not
> the case...
Okay, test removed in the updated patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.