On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 11:34:35AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> writes:
>> Recently we have supported upgrade of subscriptions,but currently
>> subscription OIDs can be changed when a cluster is upgraded using
>> pg_upgrade. It will be better to preserve them as it will be easier to
>> compare subscription related objects in pg_subscription and
>> pg_subscription_rel in the old and new clusters.
>
> I do not think that's a sufficient argument. For other object types,
> we only go through these pushups if we *have to* do so because the
> OIDs may appear in user tables or file names. I don't see a reason
> that subscriptions deserve special treatment.
I think that the idea behind that it that it would then become
possible to relax the restrictions related to the states of the
relations stored in pg_subscription_rel, which can now be only a
"ready" or "init" state (see check_old_cluster_subscription_state)
when we begin the upgrade.
I am not sure that it is a good idea to relax that for PG17 at this
stage of the development cycle, though, as we have already done a lot
in this area for pg_upgrade and it may require more tweaks during the
beta period depending on the feedback received, so I would suggest to
do more improvements for the 18 cycle instead once we have a cleaner
picture of the whole.
--
Michael