Re: CVE-2018-1058

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adrian Klaver
Тема Re: CVE-2018-1058
Дата
Msg-id a0f3f024-afae-5a46-8343-4397d6f8efe2@aklaver.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: CVE-2018-1058  (Lizeth Solis Aramayo <lizeth.solis@elfec.bo>)
Ответы RE: CVE-2018-1058  (Lizeth Solis Aramayo <lizeth.solis@elfec.bo>)
Список pgsql-general
On 10/16/19 1:05 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
> What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
> 9.6.5 version?
> 
> Pg_dump -p 5433 -U postgres -Fc -d dbkerp -n param > param.dump
> And
> Pg_restore -p 5432 -U postgres -d dbkerp param.dump
> 
> 
> Server with pg_dump is Linux red hat 7.6
> 
> Server with pg_restore is linux red hat 6.5
> 
> 
> In both servers I have postgresql 9.6, but in pg_dump is 9.6.15,   and in pg_restore is 9.6.5.
> 
> 
> The pg_dump is correct,  everything goes ok.,  but when I do the pg_restore I gota n error :  pg_restore: [archiver]
unsupportedversion (1.13) in file header
 

Forgot a fourth option:

4) Use the 9.6.15 pg_restore to restore the 9.6.15 pg_dump to the 9.6.5 
database.

> 
> 
> I searched solutions,  and I found that I can apply a patch CVE-2018-1058,  but I don¡t know how.
> How  to download,  and install,  I dont find documents about it.
> 
> he reason why you can't upgrade the 9.6.5 to 9.6.15?  I dont know how.
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changing PK on replicated database
Следующее
От: Erwin Brandstetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Can functions containing a CTE be PARALLEL SAFE?