Re: [GENERAL] Changing collate & ctype for an existing database

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От rihad
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Changing collate & ctype for an existing database
Дата
Msg-id a15ccaf0-6a32-05be-f3ab-1c308130584b@mail.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Changing collate & ctype for an existing database  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On 07/12/2017 11:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> rihad <rihad@mail.ru> writes:
>> What if only English letters are used in the textual indices (ascii
>> 0-127), would they still be impacted after datctype&datcollate
>> "C"->"en_US.UTF-8" change?
> Yes, as even minimal testing would have told you.  C sort order is
> more case-sensitive, for instance.
>
>             regards, tom lane
> .
>
Thanks. It would be great if initdb didn't assume an implicit encoding,
to prevent such fundamental configuration mistakes in the future. More
often than not collation/ctype settings of an ssh login session used to
run initdb aren't what must be used to set up the cluster. It'd be great
if initdb didn't go any further if not provided with an explicit
encoding. The error message would require the user to think twice before
proceeding, and to read up on the matter. Explicit is better than
implicit, as the old saying goes :)



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] Monitoring of a hot standby with a largely idle master
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] BDR node removal and rejoin