Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ron
Тема Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Дата
Msg-id a6e72990-cb54-f218-8111-0b3d897803cf@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On 6/2/20 4:59 AM, Grigory Smolkin wrote:


On 6/2/20 11:22 AM, Ron wrote:
The inability to do a point-in-time restoration of a single database in a multi-db cluster is a serious -- and fundamental -- missing feature (never to be implemented because of the fundamental design).
It is possible via 3rd party tools like pg_probackup and pgbackrest.

pgbackrest does not support PITR recovery of individual databases into new database names in the same cluster (so that the end user can have both the current database and an old version at the same time).


--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment