Re: raid10 hard disk choice

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew Wakeling
Тема Re: raid10 hard disk choice
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.00.0905211356440.4125@aragorn.flymine.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на raid10 hard disk choice  (Linos <info@linos.es>)
Ответы Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Schnabel <schnabelr@missouri.edu>)
Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Re: raid10 hard disk choice  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Linos wrote:
>     i have to buy a new server and in the budget i have (small) i have to
> select one of this two options:
>
> -4 sas 146gb 15k rpm raid10.
> -8 sas 146gb 10k rpm raid10.

It depends what you are doing. I think in most situations, the second
option is better, but there may be a few situations where the reverse is
true.

Basically, the first option will only be faster if you are doing lots of
seeking (small requests) in a single thread. As soon as you go
multi-threaded or are looking at sequential scans, you're better off with
more discs.

Matthew

--
 Experience is what allows you to recognise a mistake the second time you
 make it.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Linos
Дата:
Сообщение: raid10 hard disk choice
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: raid10 hard disk choice