Re: PITR performance overhead?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: PITR performance overhead?
Дата
Msg-id b42b73150608011817s67612f90n6c7940868fc6082b@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PITR performance overhead?  ("George Pavlov" <gpavlov@mynewplace.com>)
Ответы Re: PITR performance overhead?  ("Denis Lussier" <denisl@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 8/1/06, George Pavlov <gpavlov@mynewplace.com> wrote:
> I am looking for some general guidelines on what is the performance
> overhead of enabling point-in-time recovery (archive_command config) on
> an 8.1 database. Obviously it will depend on a multitude of factors, but
> some broad-brush statements and/or anecdotal evidence will suffice.
> Should one worry about its performance implications? Also, what can one
> do to mitigate it?

pitr is extremely cheap both in performance drag and administation
overhead for the benefits it provides.  it comes almost for free, just
make sure you can handle all the wal files and do sane backup
scheduling.  in fact, pitr can actually reduce the load on a server
due to running less frequent backups.  if your server is heavy i/o
loaded, it might take a bit of planning.

merlin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
Следующее
От: Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing