On 10/22/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 10/22/06 06:45, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>> Tomi NA wrote:
> >>>> I was just reading http://www.opencrx.org/faq.htm where RDBMS engines
> >>>> are one of the questions and see pgsql bashed sentence after sentence.
> >>>> Can anyone offer any insight as to weather it's fact or FUD?
> >>> It is 100% FUD.
> >>>
> >> What would be the incentive for OpenCRX spreading FUD about PostgreSQL?
> >> Does anyone know?
> >
> > That implies malice. The people at OpenCRX apparently really
> > believe what they wrote.
>
> I believe they probably do believe it and it was probably driven by a
> complete lack of understanding of PostgreSQL.
>
> It doesn't have to be malicious for it to be FUD though.
maybe. the feeling i get reading their page is that they are saying:
"mysql and postgresql, etc are made with tinker toys, you need to run
us on the real stuff". they then try to upsell you to diamond studded
titanium tinker toys, namely oracle rac.
merlin