On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've grown to adore the new \ef function editor.
>
> It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to add a view editor as
> \ev. While editors would also be good for other objects, I don't think
> we can do \et or \er etc. because those objects don't support CREATE OR
> REPLACE.
>
> Opinions? Other objects which could take \e?
One reason I don't like this proposal is that postgresql does not
preserve the original 'create view' statement for editing. The
resulting sql that is given to you to edit is hopelessly mangled and I
think it's not good to encourage people to modify views in this
fashion.
Then again, we are only reproducing what pgadmin can already do, so why not? :-)
merlin