Re: database size growing continously

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: database size growing continously
Дата
Msg-id b42b73150910300543i19375817xf4a140c97d36cd1d@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: database size growing continously  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Ответы Re: database size growing continously  (Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Steve Crawford
<scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
> Peter Meszaros wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I use postgresql 8.3.7 as a huge queue. There is a very simple table
>> with six columns and two indices, and about 6 million records are
>> written into it in every day continously commited every 10 seconds from
>> 8 clients. The table stores approximately 120 million records, because a
>> cron job daily deletes those ones are older than 20 day.
>
> You may be an ideal candidate for table partitioning - this is frequently
> used for rotating log table maintenance.
>
> Use a parent table and 20 child tables. Create a new child every day and
> drop the 20-day-old table. Table drops are far faster and lower-impact than
> delete-from a 120-million row table. Index-bloat is limited to one-day of
> inserts and will be eliminated in 20-days. No deletes means no vacuum
> requirement on the affected tables. Single tables are limited to about
> 6-million records. A clever backup scheme can ignore prior-days' static
> child-tables (and you could keep historical-data-dumps off-line for later
> use if desired).
>
> Read up on it here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html

From a performance point of view, this is going to be the best option.
 It might push some complexity though into his queries to invoke
constraint exclusion or deal directly with the child partitions.

merlin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan