Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Дата
Msg-id b61cbd7b86c9b18c8b6b871ab8000105218b3efa.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 16:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe this means we are not ready to do ICU-by-default in v16.
> It certainly feels like there might be more here than we want to
> start designing post-feature-freeze.

I don't see how punting to the next release helps. If the CREATE
DATABASE syntax (and similar issues for createdb and initdb) in v15 is
just too confusing, and we can't find a remedy for v16, then we
probably won't find a remedy for v17 either.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Следующее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction