On 24.03.23 08:26, Andres Freund wrote:
>> For the .css: docbook-xsl actually has support for writing the .css: [1] - but
>> it requires the .css file be valid xml. I wonder if the cleanest approch would
>> be to have a build step to create .css.xml - then the non-chunked build's
>> generate.css.header would do the right thing.
>
> We don't even need to do that! The attached patch just creates a wrapper
> css.xml that loads the .css via an entity reference.
That looks like a better solution.
> I don't know if my hack of putting the paramters in stylesheet-common.xsl is
> reasonable. Perhaps we should just include stylesheet-html-common.xsl in
> stylesheet-hh.xsl, then this uglyness wouldn't be required.
Maybe, but it's not clear whether all the customizations in there are
applicable to htmlhelp.
Another option here is to remove support for htmlhelp.