Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?
Дата
Msg-id c70a57f9-cfff-3b9d-3b65-44cb7f898111@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WAL segmentes names in wrong order?  (Tom DalPozzo <t.dalpozzo@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 11/3/16 12:28 PM, Tom DalPozzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I found, in pg_xlog dir, several WAL segment files with old modification
> timestamp but with their names greater than more recent files.
> Ex.:
> 0000000100000000000000C6      modified today
> 0000000100000000000000DE      modified yesterday

This is completely normal.  WAL files are recycled so a file with a
later name can have an earlier timestamp.  What this means is it is
available but has not been used to record transactions yet.

So, 0000000100000000000000C6 is the end of your current WAL stream.

--
-David
david@pgmasters.net


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom DalPozzo
Дата:
Сообщение: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?
Следующее
От: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL segmentes names in wrong order?