Re: Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Henry C.
Тема Re: Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql
Дата
Msg-id d06ed907fa47ee31bb11ffe83805952c.squirrel@support.metroweb.co.za
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql  (Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au>)
Ответы Re: Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> I've done some testing of PostgreSQL on different filesystems, and with
> different filesystem mount options.

Since Pg is already "journalling", why bother duplicating (and pay the
performance penalty, whatever that penalty may be) the effort for no real
gain (except maybe a redundant sense of safety)?  ie, use a
non-journalling battle-tested fs like ext2.

Regards
Henry

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Toby Corkindale
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Poor performance of btrfs with Postgresql
Следующее
От: Tiruvenkatasamy Baskaran
Дата:
Сообщение: Which version of postgresql supports replication on RHEL6?