On 01.03.22 20:50, Brar Piening wrote:
> Patch is attached. I don't think it should get applied this way, though.
> The fact that you only get links for section headers that have manually
> assigned ids would be pretty surprising for users of the docs and in
> some files (e.g. protocol-flow.html) only every other section has a
> manually assigned id. It would be easy to emit a message (or even fail)
> whenever the template fails to find an id and then manually assign ids
> until they are everywhere (currently that means all varlistentries and
> sections) but that would a) be quite some work and b) make the patch
> quite heavy, so I wouldn't even start this before there is really
> consensus that this is the right direction.
I have applied the part of your patch that adds the id's. The
discussion about the formatting aspect can continue.
I changed the id's for the protocol messages to mixed case, so that it
matches how these are commonly referred to elsewhere. It doesn't affect
the output.