Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Browne
Тема Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
Дата
Msg-id d6d6637f0901251106s2e79467m1fe66b692a383508@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Ezra Taylor <ezra.taylor@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Andre Majorel <aym-2lqsgp@teaser.fr>)
Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem  (Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>)
Список pgsql-admin
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ezra Taylor <ezra.taylor@gmail.com> wrote:
> All:
>        Do any of you have gripes about using XFS with the latest version of
> postgres?

I'd not expect there to be much specific benefit to it...

I did some benchmarking, now quite a while ago, which showed XFS to
be, for a totally write-bound workload, a *few* percent better than
ext3/JFS, but note that this is only a minor difference.

The fact that XFS isn't one of the "more highly supported" filesystems
on Linux is something I'd consider a *way* more important factor.

When balancing "oh, maybe a tiny percentage faster" against "oh,
nobody will be in a position to offer much support if anything goes
wrong," I'll take "easier to support" any day.


--
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
Robert Benchley  - "Drawing on my fine command of the English
language, I said nothing."

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ezra Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: postgresql and xfs filesystrem
Следующее
От: Andre Majorel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgresql and xfs filesystrem