On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:47 PM, Loic Petit <tls.wydd@free.fr> wrote:
> I was a bit confused about the read and write sorry ! I understand what you
> mean...
> But do you think that the IO cost (of only one page) needed to handle the
> index writing is superior than 300ms ? Because each insert in any of these
> tables is that slow.
> NB: between my "small" and my "big" tests the only difference is the number
> of table (10 and 3000), there is almost the same amount of on-disk data
It could be that the tables or indexes are heavily bloated. What's
the churn rate on these tables / indexes?