On 8/10/21 11:27 PM, 孙诗浩(思才) wrote:
> we can use regular expressions (<>|!=) to cover "<>" and "!=".
> There is no
> need to have two definitions less_greater and not_equals, because it
> will confuse developer.
> So, we can use only not_equals to cover this operator set.
>
>
I don't understand the problem being solved here. This looks like a
change with no discernable benefit. I don't agree that the current code
is substantially more likely to confuse developers. And the lexer is not
something that gets a lot of change.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com