On 23.02.24 12:23, 小泉 悟 wrote:
> Upon closer inspection, F305 is also "INTERSECT ALL table operator”.
> Perhaps F302-02 would be unnecessary.
Correct, F302-02 should have been deleted. I have fixed it, thanks.
>
>> 2024/02/23 18:06、Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>のメール:
>>
>>> On 23 Feb 2024, at 06:36, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The correct result would be as follows:
>>>
>>> F302 INTERSECT table operator
>>> F302-02 INTERSECT ALL table operator
>>> F303 INTERSECT DISTINCT table operator
>>> F304 EXCEPT ALL table operator
>>
>> This was changed recently in c9f57541d970 which changed subfeatures to
>> top-level features to match the SQL:2023 standard, F303 was previously a
>> sub-feature named F302-01. That being said, I agree that it makes sense to
>> place F303 below F302-02 as per the attached, unless Peter (on cc:) objects.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Gustafsson
>>
>> <f303.diff>
>
>
>