Hello,
I wanted to share something else I learned in my proximity search work.
One my requirements is to order by the distance that matches are found
from the center point.
When did this using earth_distance(), the benefit of the earth_box()
technique over the old geo_distance became minimal as I approached a
250mi radius.
Switching to sorting by cube_distance() offered a huge benefit, allowing
the earth_distance() query to run in about 100ms vs 300ms for the
geo_distance() equivalent.
I checked the results that cube_distance() produced versus
earth_distance(). cube_distance() is always (not surprisingly) a little
smaller, but the difference seems only grows to about a mile for a 250
mile radius. That's an acceptable margin of error for this application,
and may be for others as well.
Mark