Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Дата
Msg-id f3cf932f2453ac9acda9fb36708367ea294de699.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 12:29 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > Is the problem you're worried about here that, with something like
> > an
> > index-organized table, you can have multiple row versions that have
> > the same logical tuple ID, i.e. primary key value? 
> 
> That's what I'm talking about. I'd like to hear what you think about
> it.

FWIW, this is not a problem in my table AM. I am fine having different
TIDs for each version, just like heapam.

For index-organized tables it does seem like an interesting problem.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs