Re: Remove an unnecessary errmsg_plural in dependency.c

On 24.03.22 06:17, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> The comment and errmsg_plural don't seem to be consistent.  When the
> code was added by c4f2a0458d, it had only singular form and already
> had the comment.  After that 8032d76b5 turned it to errmsg_plural
> ignoring the comment.  It seems like a thinko of 8032d76b5.

I have removed the comment.