Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Luzanov
Тема Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Дата
Msg-id fcbe2851-f1fb-9863-54bc-a95dc7a0d946@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hello,

I found that the 'standalone backend' backend type is not documented 
right now.
Adding something like (from commit message) would be helpful:

Both the bootstrap backend and single user mode backends will have 
backend_type STANDALONE_BACKEND.

-- 
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode