On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> As I read it, it's meant to leave room for defining more escapes.
> If we allowed \x for any non-currently-defined "x" to just be "x",
> then there would be a compatibility problem if we wanted to make
> it mean something else. But I think it's sufficient to reserve
> the ASCII letters for that purpose.
Sounds good, patch attached.
Regards,
Jeff Davis