Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ivan Voras
Тема Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance
Дата
Msg-id h8oave$ohn$1@ger.gmane.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote:
>> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>>> like joining the result to another table...the planner can see
>>> 'through' the view, etc.  in a function, the result is fetched first
>>> and materialized without looking at the rest of the query.
>> I though the planner would "see through" SQL language functions and
>> inline them when possible, so they often can make for parametrized
>> views...
>
> It can happen for simple functions but often it will not.  For views
> it always happens.

Are functions in language 'sql' handled differently than those of
language 'plpgsql'?

I think they're not so in any case a function will behave as a black box
with regards to the planner and optimizer (and views are always
'transparent').

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to post Performance Questions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance