Re: [PATCH v9] GSSAPI encryption support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robbie Harwood
Тема Re: [PATCH v9] GSSAPI encryption support
Дата
Msg-id jlgtwjm4bby.fsf@thriss.redhat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH v9] GSSAPI encryption support  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH v9] GSSAPI encryption support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> > +   iov[0].iov_base = lenbuf;
>> > +   iov[0].iov_len = 4;
>> > +   iov[1].iov_base = output.value;
>> > +   iov[1].iov_len = output.length;
>> > +
>> > +   ret = writev(port->sock, iov, 2);
>> >
>> > writev and iovec are not present on Windows, so this code would never
>> > compile there, and it does not sound that this patch is a reason
>> > sufficient enough to drop support of GSSAPI on Windows.
>>
>> Um.  Okay.  I guess on Windows I'll make two write calls then, since the
>> only other option I see is to hit alloc again here.
>
> Hmm, I wouldn't push my luck by using writev here at all.  We don't use
> writev/readv anywhere, and it's quite possible that they are not present
> on older Unixen which we still support.
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/writev.html
> says writev was introduced in "issue 4 version 2", which AFAICT is the
> 2004 version, but our baseline is SUSv2 (1997).  So it's definitely not
> workable.

Understood.  What do you suggest instead?  To give some context here,
writev() is being used here because I have a GSSAPI payload that is
(effectively) opaque and need to include length in it.  The only
alternatives I can see are either allocating a new buffer and reading
the payload + length into it (incurs additional memory overhead), or
calling a write/send function twice (incurs syscall overhead at
minimum).

>> > +   {
>> > +       {"gss_encrypt", PGC_USERSET, CONN_AUTH_SECURITY,
>> > +        gettext_noop("Require encryption for all GSSAPI connections."),
>> > +        NULL,
>> > +        GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE | GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE
>> > +       },
>> > +       &gss_encrypt, false, check_gss_encrypt, assign_gss_encrypt, NULL
>> > +   },
>
> Why is this marked NOT_IN_SAMPLE?

Well, because it's not something that's supposed to be set in the file
(and indeed, you can't set it there, if I understand
GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE).  It's used only as a connection parameter, and I
use its presence / absence for the client and server to negotiate GSSAPI
encryption support.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation