Patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
Тема Patches
Дата
Msg-id m106nls-0000bnC@druid.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Patches  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I sent in a patch for createuser almost a week ago and I was wondering
what the procedure is.  I haven't seen the patch applied but I also
haven't seen it rejected.  I understand that not every one of my little
gems is going to make it in but I hope there is some sort of closure
method built into the process.  In this case I think I have a useful
little addition to createuser but if I am alone, it isn't important
enough to diverge from the standard distribution.  I just need to
know one way or the other.

In fact, this is the second time I sent in a similar patch for createuser
and I never heard anything about the first time either and that was before
6.4 was released.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules
Следующее
От: Charles Hornberger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules