Hi,
I though we were more specific about an extension's object itself not
living in a schema in our documentation, but I agree we still have room
for progress here.
"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> + Note that only the extension objects will be placed into the named
> + schema; the extension itself is a database-global object.
I think you're patching the right place, but I'm not sure about the term
"database-global object", that I can't find by grepping in sgml/ref.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support