Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> Hmm, I was thinking that when walsender gets the position it can send the
> WAL up to, in GetStandbyFlushRecPtr(), it could atomically check the current
> recovery timeline. If it has changed, refuse to send the new WAL and
> terminate. That would be a fairly small change, it would just close the
> window between requesting walsenders to terminate and them actually
> terminating.
It looks to me like a bug fix that also applies to non cascading
situation. Is that right?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support