Re: .gitignore files, take two

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James Cloos
Тема Re: .gitignore files, take two
Дата
Msg-id m339seevst.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на .gitignore files, take two  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: .gitignore files, take two  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: .gitignore files, take two  (Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I'm reading this a bit late, but...

We (Xorg) found that ignoring:
  *~  *.bak  *.patch

in addition to the files generated by building is very helpful.

We do use git tag and git describe in the make dist process, as
well as git log >ChangeLog.  That may be relevant; avoiding git
describe's dirty designation is important when using it in that
fashion.  But it helps to be able to run git add --all cleanly.

I understand that other git users have similar experience.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gurjeet Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: .gitignore files, take two