Dear all,
don't know if it has something to do with this, but the last two days snaps were broken. Today's one seems to be ok.
Error messages follow
Regards,
Raphaël
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/postgresql -I./include -I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2ud-2.5 -D__WXDEBUG__
-D__WXGTK__-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -I/usr/include -DDATA_DIR=\"/usr/share/pgadmin3/\" -Wall -g
-I../src/include-I -g -O2 -c -o pgConn.o `test -f 'db/pgConn.cpp' || echo './'`db/pgConn.cpp
db/pgConn.cpp: In function `void pgNoticeProcessor(void *, const char *)':
db/pgConn.cpp:35: `pgNoticeProcessor(void *, const char *)' was declared `extern' and later `static'
include/pgConn.h:81: previous declaration of `pgNoticeProcessor(void *, const char *)'
----Message d'origine----
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] make distcheck
>Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 22:28:04 +0100
>De: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
>A: "Adam H. Pendleton" <fmonkey@fmonkey.net>,
>
>Sorry, I thought we backed it out because it broke the build.
>
>OK, testing now and it seems to link OK, then comes up with:
>
>make[3]: *** No rule to make target `ui/common/*.xrc', needed by
>`all-am'. Stop.
>make[3]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/local/src/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-0.1.1/_build/src'
>make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>make[2]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/local/src/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-0.1.1/_build'
>make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
>make[1]: Leaving directory
>`/usr/local/src/pgadmin3/pgadmin3-0.1.1/_build'
>make: *** [distcheck] Error 2
>
>A normal build seems OK.
>
>Regards, Dave.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey@fmonkey.net]
>> Sent: 09 July 2003 17:03
>> To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org; Dave Page
>> Subject: make distcheck
>>
>>
>> I never got an update on whether my patch fixed the make
>> distcheck for
>> everyone.
>>
>> ahp
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>