Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От PFC
Тема Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join
Дата
Msg-id op.uap8e3owcigqcu@apollo13.peufeu.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join  (Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>)
Ответы Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join  (Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, 06 May 2008 10:21:43 +0200, Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
wrote:

> L.S.
>
> I'm noticing a difference in planning between a join and an in() clause,
> before trying to create an independent test-case, I'd like to know if
> there's
> an obvious reason why this would be happening:

Is the function STABLE ?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Frank van Vugt
Дата:
Сообщение: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join
Следующее
От: Vlad Arkhipov
Дата:
Сообщение: Seqscan problem