Обсуждение: Security Wizard in III

Why isn't there a Security Wizard in PgAdmin III?

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

Chris Gamache wrote:

>Why isn't there a Security Wizard in PgAdmin III?
>
>
Did you implement it?

Regards,
Andreas

I guess I had that coming... :)


What I meant was "Wasn't the security wizard a great feature in PgAdmin II? I
wonder why its not in PgAdmin III yet? Do the developers feel it wouldn't be
necessary because they have something better built in? Is there something in
the PostgreSQL schema support that precludes its use?"

And I'm guessing the answers to those questions are "Yes; It hasn't been done;
No; and No."

Its a shame that at this time I'm such an unskilled C++ programmer, or I could
lend a hand. :) I'd be glad to write documentation for it when the time comes,
tho.

CG


--- Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> wrote:
> Chris Gamache wrote:
>
> >Why isn't there a Security Wizard in PgAdmin III?
> >
> >
> Did you implement it?
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Gamache [mailto:cgg007@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 05 March 2004 17:37
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Security Wizard in III
>
>
> I guess I had that coming... :)

Kindof, though I might have added a smiley...

>
> What I meant was "Wasn't the security wizard a great feature
> in PgAdmin II? I wonder why its not in PgAdmin III yet? Do
> the developers feel it wouldn't be necessary because they
> have something better built in? Is there something in the
> PostgreSQL schema support that precludes its use?"
>
> And I'm guessing the answers to those questions are "Yes; It
> hasn't been done; No; and No."

Umm, yes; it hasn't been done; no; and no.

It's one of those version 2 things, along with the other more useful
wizards...

> Its a shame that at this time I'm such an unskilled C++
> programmer, or I could lend a hand. :) I'd be glad to write
> documentation for it when the time comes, tho.

Are you experienced in any languages? When I finally knuckled down to
it, it only took me a couple of weeks to get going with C++ - in fact my
first real C++ code was the guts of pga3.

Regardless though, if you feel you can improve *any* of the
documentation we would certainly appreciate your efforts.

Regards, Dave.

Dave Page wrote:

>>What I meant was "Wasn't the security wizard a great feature
>>in PgAdmin II? I wonder why its not in PgAdmin III yet? Do
>>the developers feel it wouldn't be necessary because they
>>have something better built in? Is there something in the
>>PostgreSQL schema support that precludes its use?"
>>
>>And I'm guessing the answers to those questions are "Yes; It
>>hasn't been done; No; and No."
>>
>>
>
>Umm, yes; it hasn't been done; no; and no.
>
>It's one of those version 2 things, along with the other more useful
>wizards...
>
>
yes, it hasn't been done, no, no. It's already on the todo-list for
quite a while.

>Regardless though, if you feel you can improve *any* of the
>documentation we would certainly appreciate your efforts.
>
>
>
>
Chris,
you're welcome if you like to review the doc and enhance it. We feel
that a good program should have a good documentation, and the current
doc is not too sophisticated.

Regards,
Andreas