Обсуждение: CHANGELOG
Hi, I added the version number back into all the changelog entires that you removed them from. We know what the version number will be so it makes no sense not to include it now and save me 10 minutes of post-release editting later on. Regards, Dave.
Dave Page wrote: > Hi, > > I added the version number back into all the changelog entires that you > removed them from. We know what the version number will be so it makes > no sense not to include it now and save me 10 minutes of post-release > editting later on. > Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had a release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked as relased that never will. Regards, Andreas
-----Original Message----- From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 01/05/06 11:41:59 To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had a > release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked as > relased that never will. And they still need removing. This way I have less work at release time, and the notes changes less over time. /D -----Unmodified Original Message----- Dave Page wrote: > Hi, > > I added the version number back into all the changelog entires that you > removed them from. We know what the version number will be so it makes > no sense not to include it now and save me 10 minutes of post-release > editting later on. > Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had a release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked as relased that never will. Regards, Andreas
Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- From: "Andreas > Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 01/05/06 11:41:59 To: "Dave > Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: > "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > > >> Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had >> a release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked >> as relased that never will. > > > And they still need removing. This way I have less work at release > time, and the notes changes less over time. I don'T understand what you mean. What needs removing? Regards, Andreas
-----Original Message----- From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 01/05/06 15:36:36 To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > I don'T understand what you mean. What needs removing? The features you mentioned that may never get released. /D -----Unmodified Original Message----- Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- From: "Andreas > Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 01/05/06 11:41:59 To: "Dave > Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: > "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > > >> Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had >> a release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked >> as relased that never will. > > > And they still need removing. This way I have less work at release > time, and the notes changes less over time. I don'T understand what you mean. What needs removing? Regards, Andreas
Dave Page wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> > Sent: 01/05/06 15:36:36 > To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> > Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > > >>I don'T understand what you mean. What needs removing? > > > The features you mentioned that may never get released. Hm? They usually are removed/replaced immediately, not when releasing, no? Regards, Andreas
-----Original Message----- From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> Sent: 01/05/06 16:38:48 To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > Hm? They usually are removed/replaced immediately, not when releasing, no? Ideally, meaning even less work at release time. See, it's a win all round :-) /D -----Unmodified Original Message----- Dave Page wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> > Sent: 01/05/06 15:36:36 > To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> > Cc: "pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org"<pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: CHANGELOG > > >>I don'T understand what you mean. What needs removing? > > > The features you mentioned that may never get released. Hm? They usually are removed/replaced immediately, not when releasing, no? Regards, Andreas