Обсуждение: Need suggestion for showing boolean parameters on Property Dialogs
Hi All,
I am currently working on window function (pg 8.4 new features).
I need suggestions from all of you, while showing the boolean properties
in the properties dialog.
As you can see in the screen shot attached, we have now good number of boolean
parameters in the properties.
And, now we're lack of space.
We can't go all the time to increase the size of the dialog.
We need some mechanism to saw these kind of parameters to utilize the space properly.
Please send me some suggestion on this.
I am currently working on window function (pg 8.4 new features).
I need suggestions from all of you, while showing the boolean properties
in the properties dialog.
As you can see in the screen shot attached, we have now good number of boolean
parameters in the properties.
And, now we're lack of space.
We can't go all the time to increase the size of the dialog.
We need some mechanism to saw these kind of parameters to utilize the space properly.
Please send me some suggestion on this.
--
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am currently working on window function (pg 8.4 new features). > I need suggestions from all of you, while showing the boolean properties > in the properties dialog. > > As you can see in the screen shot attached, we have now good number of > boolean > parameters in the properties. > > And, now we're lack of space. > We can't go all the time to increase the size of the dialog. > We need some mechanism to saw these kind of parameters to utilize the space > properly. Hi Ashesh, For some reason the image isn't displaying here - but what about using a wxCheckListBox? http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxchecklistbox.html#wxchecklistbox -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Hi Dave,
Please see below:
Dave Page wrote:
But, then realized, we may need to disable some parameters for particular
version of the Postgresql. I couldn't find anything like this in the documents. :(
We may need to inherit that control and our own dray feature. I don't think, it is
worth put that much efforts.
What do you say?
Please find the image for the screen-shot.
Please see below:
Dave Page wrote:
I already started working with wxCheckListBox.we have now good number of boolean parameters in the properties. And, now we're lack of space. We can't go all the time to increase the size of the dialog. We need some mechanism to saw these kind of parameters to utilize the space properly.Hi Ashesh, For some reason the image isn't displaying here - but what about using a wxCheckListBox? http://docs.wxwidgets.org/stable/wx_wxchecklistbox.html#wxchecklistbox
But, then realized, we may need to disable some parameters for particular
version of the Postgresql. I couldn't find anything like this in the documents. :(
We may need to inherit that control and our own dray feature. I don't think, it is
worth put that much efforts.
What do you say?
Please find the image for the screen-shot.
--
Вложения
Hi Ashesh On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I already started working with wxCheckListBox. > > But, then realized, we may need to disable some parameters for particular > version of the Postgresql. I couldn't find anything like this in the > documents. :( > We may need to inherit that control and our own dray feature. I don't think, > it is > worth put that much efforts. > > What do you say? No, I don't think it is worth it at the moment. You could put the checkboxes in a 2 x 2 grid and see if that looks OK. If not, just shrink the comment box a little. I don't think we're at crisis point yet, and when we do get there we can always split the properties across 2 pages (I think we already do that for one object type - I forget which atm). -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Hi Dave Page,
I just sent the patch and currently used this logic only. :)I already started working with wxCheckListBox. But, then realized, we may need to disable some parameters for particular version of the Postgresql. I couldn't find anything like this in the documents. :( We may need to inherit that control and our own dray feature. I don't think, it is worth put that much efforts. What do you say?No, I don't think it is worth it at the moment. You could put the checkboxes in a 2 x 2 grid and see if that looks OK. If not, just shrink the comment box a little. I don't think we're at crisis point yet, and when we do get there we can always split the properties across 2 pages (I think we already do that for one object type - I forget which atm).
--