Обсуждение: Fw: Feature requests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Fw: Feature requests

От
"A.j. Langereis"
Дата:

Dear all,

 

Since I did not get any reaction yet, I wondered if my question was received at all. Therefore I sent it again.

If it was received, please consider this email as never sent.

 

Your sincerely,

 

Aarjan Langereis

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 6:28 PM
Subject: Feature requests

To whom it may concern,
 
First of all I would like to thank all who worked on the new pgAdmin: the new style and graphical explains are super!
 
Nevertheless I ran into a "bug", or maybe better: a feature-request. When one is creating a new foreign key via the tool, it is not possible to select "no action" for either "on update" or "on delete". This is a pitty, because "restrict", which is almost the same, doesn't allow constraints to be deferrable. In order to solve this, the constraints have to be made via the query tool.
 
Another request would be to able to "change" foreign key properties (like Deferrable, Deferred, On Update, etc..). When applying the changes pgAdmin would than drop the foreign key and recreate it with the new settings. To garanty consistency the table could be locked exclusively.
 
A final request would be to have "mouseover hints". This would really benefit new user (and experienced ones with new features)!
 
Hopefully these suggestions are usefull to you and can we benefit from them in the (near) future.
 
Your sincerely,
 
Aarjan Langereis

Re: Fw: Feature requests

От
Andreas Pflug
Дата:
A.j. Langereis wrote:

> Nevertheless I ran into a "bug", or maybe better: a feature-request. 
> When one is creating a new foreign key via the tool, it is not possible 
> to select "no action" for either "on update" or "on delete". This is a 
> pitty, because "restrict", which is almost the same, doesn't allow 
> constraints to be deferrable. In order to solve this, the constraints 
> have to be made via the query tool.

Obviously pgsql has changed unnoticed from us since this was implemented 
in pgAdmin back in 7.3 times. We'll add this.

> Another request would be to able to "change" foreign key properties 
> (like Deferrable, Deferred, On Update, etc..). When applying the changes 
> pgAdmin would than drop the foreign key and recreate it with the new 
> settings. To garanty consistency the table could be locked exclusively.

This isn't by far as easy as it sounds, because OID will change.
>  
> A final request would be to have "mouseover hints". This would really 
> benefit new user (and experienced ones with new features)!

And show what? We do have mouse over on the toolbar, IMNSHO anything 
more would be annoing. People not knowing what the program does are good 
advised to RTFM, it won't bite.

Regards,
Andreas



Re: Fw: Feature requests

От
"A.j. Langereis"
Дата:
> A.j. Langereis wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless I ran into a "bug", or maybe better: a feature-request.
> > When one is creating a new foreign key via the tool, it is not possible
> > to select "no action" for either "on update" or "on delete". This is a
> > pitty, because "restrict", which is almost the same, doesn't allow
> > constraints to be deferrable. In order to solve this, the constraints
> > have to be made via the query tool.
>
> Obviously pgsql has changed unnoticed from us since this was implemented
> in pgAdmin back in 7.3 times. We'll add this.
>

Great!

> > Another request would be to able to "change" foreign key properties
> > (like Deferrable, Deferred, On Update, etc..). When applying the changes
> > pgAdmin would than drop the foreign key and recreate it with the new
> > settings. To garanty consistency the table could be locked exclusively.
>
> This isn't by far as easy as it sounds, because OID will change.

Hmm, that's a pitty... But what problems could that cause if the OID
changes? I always thought that it was a ID from the system catalogs. So if
you drop the FK and recreate it, that shouldn't be a problem? Or am I
overlooking something?

> >
> > A final request would be to have "mouseover hints". This would really
> > benefit new user (and experienced ones with new features)!
>
> And show what? We do have mouse over on the toolbar, IMNSHO anything
> more would be annoing. People not knowing what the program does are good
> advised to RTFM, it won't bite.
>

I agree with you on the latter! Nevertheless, I think it can be very usefull
to have the hints for the properties in, for instance, the property screens.
Hints in the tree-view for instance would indeed be very useless..

Finally I would like to ask for another feature: let double clicking on an
object open it's property screen (if available). This would make working
with the tool more efficient!

Your sincerely,

Aarjan Langereis