Обсуждение: VACUUM ANALYZE differs under 7.2.3 from 7.2.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

VACUUM ANALYZE differs under 7.2.3 from 7.2.1

От
Jeff Boes
Дата:
The "VACUUM ANALYZE tablename" command does not have the same effect on
table metadata under 7.2.1 and 7.2.3.  In particular, I've noted that
pg_class.reltuples is not updated by vacuuming after a delete.

Here is a sequence of SQL commands to demonstrate the difference.  Under
7.2.1, the resulting last three displays of the pg_class.reltuples value
will be zero (0), while under 7.2.3 it will be 10.

create table foo (a char(1));

copy foo from stdin;

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

\.

\x

\t

select count(*) from foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

vacuum foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

vacuum analyze foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

analyze foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

delete from foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

select count(*) from foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

vacuum foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

vacuum analyze foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

analyze foo;

select reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'foo';

drop table foo;

Re: VACUUM ANALYZE differs under 7.2.3 from 7.2.1

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes:
> The "VACUUM ANALYZE tablename" command does not have the same effect on
> table metadata under 7.2.1 and 7.2.3.  In particular, I've noted that
> pg_class.reltuples is not updated by vacuuming after a delete.

Hard to believe ... I see no changes in the 7.2.* CVS logs that might
cause such a problem.

> Here is a sequence of SQL commands to demonstrate the difference.  Under
> 7.2.1, the resulting last three displays of the pg_class.reltuples value
> will be zero (0), while under 7.2.3 it will be 10.

Here I get zeroes, as you expect, with 7.2.3.  Some problem with your
installation perhaps?

            regards, tom lane